Wednesday, October 15, 2025

The Hidden Legal Gem: Vietnam's Underutilized "Responsibility Contracts" 💎⚖️

 

Etymology Corner 📚✨

The word "responsibility" comes from the Latin "respondere," meaning "to answer" or "to pledge in return." Just like how ancient Romans pledged their word in the forum, modern Vietnamese businesses can pledge accountability through responsibility contracts! 🏛️



In a Nutshell: The Legal Mystery 🕵️‍♂️

Picture this: You're digging through Vietnam's Labor Code 2019, all 241 articles of legal goodness, and you stumble upon a legal unicorn 🦄 - the "responsibility contract" (hợp đồng trách nhiệm). But here's the plot twist that would make M. Night Shyamalan jealous: this powerful legal tool is mentioned only TWICE in the entire Labor Code! 😱

That's like finding a swiss army knife in a toolbox and using it only as a paperweight! 🔧📎

📊 Simple Infographic: The Responsibility Contract Landscape

🏢 Vietnamese Businesses Using Responsibility Contracts
▓░░░░░░░░░ 10% (estimated)

💡 Potential Benefits if Properly Utilized  
▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ 90%

📖 Legal Coverage in Labor Code
▓░░░░░░░░░ 0.8% (2 mentions out of 241 articles)

What Exactly IS a Responsibility Contract? 🤔

Think of it as a legal superhero cape for your employment relationship! 🦸‍♂️ A responsibility contract is essentially:

  • A written agreement that specifies who's responsible for what assets
  • A damage control mechanism that predetermines compensation rules
  • A business protection shield against workplace mishaps
  • An employee accountability booster 📈

Real-Life Example 🏠🚗

Scenario: TechCorp Vietnam gives manager Mike a company laptop worth $2,000. Without a responsibility contract, if Mike accidentally drops it in a coffee shop ☕💻, the company might struggle to recover costs. WITH a responsibility contract, the terms are crystal clear from day one!


The Legal Framework Deep Dive 🏊‍♂️⚖️

According to Article 129 of Vietnam's Labor Code 2019, here's the legal magic:

Damage Categories & Compensation Rules:

🟢 Minor Damages (Negligence-based)

  • Value: ≤ 10 months minimum wage
  • Max compensation: 3 months' salary
  • Payment method: Monthly deductions from salary

🔴 Major Damages (Loss/Excessive Use)

  • Compensation: Partial or full market value
  • Special rule: If there's a responsibility contract, compensation follows the contract terms! 💪

⚡ Force Majeure Exceptions

  • Natural disasters 🌪️
  • Fire, war, dangerous epidemics 🔥
  • Unforeseeable events beyond control

Why Are Vietnamese Businesses Sleeping on This? 😴💼

Here's the million-dong question: If responsibility contracts are so useful, why does almost nobody use them? 🤷‍♂️

The Mystery Factors:

  • Minimal legal guidance - only 2 brief mentions
  • Lack of awareness among HR departments
  • Traditional reliance on basic employment contracts
  • Fear of complexity in implementation

But here's the kicker: Smart businesses using these contracts gain MASSIVE advantages! 🚀


🤔 Did You Know? Legal Trivia Time!

Fun Fact #1: The term "responsibility contract" appears in Vietnamese labor law more rarely than a solar eclipse! 🌒

Fun Fact #2: Under Vietnamese law, you can't deduct more than 30% of an employee's monthly salary for damage compensation - even with a responsibility contract! 💰

Fun Fact #3: If your company illegally deducts salary, fines range from 10-80 million VND depending on how many employees are affected! 😬


Nature's Law Comparison 🌿🦁

In the animal kingdom, meerkats have designated "sentries" who are responsible for watching for danger while others forage. If a sentry fails, the whole colony suffers! 🐭👀

Similarly, responsibility contracts create designated "asset guardians" in your workplace ecosystem. Clear roles = better survival! 🌍


💡 Pro Tips for Implementation

For Employers:

  • Draft detailed terms - specify exact damage scenarios
  • Include force majeure clauses for natural disasters
  • Set reasonable compensation limits within legal bounds
  • Train HR staff on proper deduction procedures

For Employees:

  • Read every clause carefully before signing
  • Understand your liability limits
  • Know your rights regarding salary deductions
  • Document asset conditions when receiving company property

Real-World Applications 🌟

Manufacturing Companies 🏭

  • Equipment responsibility for machine operators
  • Tool accountability for maintenance staff

Tech Companies 💻

  • Laptop/device responsibility for remote workers
  • Software license compliance contracts

Retail Businesses 🛍️

  • Cash register responsibility for cashiers
  • Inventory management contracts for warehouse staff

The Penalty Game: When Things Go Wrong 🚨💸

Employer Violations: If companies mess up the compensation process:

  • 5-10 million VND fine for improper procedures
  • Must pay back wrongfully deducted amounts
  • Interest payments at highest bank rates

Employee Violations:

  • Compensation capped at 3 months' salary for minor damages
  • Full market value for major losses (if contract specifies)

📝 Quick Knowledge Quiz!

Question 1: How many times is "responsibility contract" mentioned in Vietnam's Labor Code 2019? a) 5 times b) 10 times c) 2 times d) Never

Question 2: What's the maximum monthly salary deduction allowed? a) 50% b) 30% c) 25% d) 40%

Question 3: Minor damage compensation is capped at: a) 1 month salary b) 6 months salary c) 3 months salary d) 2 months salary

(Answers: c, b, c)


😂 Legal Meme Corner

📱 Employee drops company phone
😰 Employee: "It was an accident!"
😎 Smart employer with responsibility contract: "Good thing we planned for this!"
😭 Employer without contract: "There goes our quarterly budget..."

🗣️ Your Turn to Speak!

What's your experience with workplace asset responsibility? Have you encountered situations where a responsibility contract would have been a game-changer? Share your war stories in the comments below! 💬

Do you think Vietnamese businesses should embrace this underutilized legal tool more widely? Let's start a conversation! 👇


🚨 Fun But Serious: A Brief Legal Disclaimer 🚨

Hey there, legal explorer! 🕵️♂️ Before you go...

  • This article is like a map, not a teleporter 🗺️ It'll guide you, but won't zap your problems away!
  • Each legal journey is unique 🦄 Your mileage may vary!
  • For real-world quests, seek a professional legal wizard 🧙‍♂️ (May we suggest Thay Diep & Associates Law Firm?)

Remember: Reading this doesn't make you a lawyer, just like watching "Top Gun" doesn't make you a pilot! ✈️😉


💝 Support Your Legal Ninja's Wellness Fund! 🍵

Enjoyed Ngọc Prinny's witty legal wisdom? Help keep this ninja healthy and energized!

Every article is powered by:

  • Hours of research 📚
  • Legal expertise spanning 10+ years ⚖️
  • Creative storytelling 📝
  • And lots of herbal tea! 🍵

If my posts have helped you navigate Vietnam's legal labyrinth, consider treating me to a healthy green tea! Your support helps keep the legal puns flowing, the knowledge growing, and this ninja well-rested for better content! 🌱


Sweet Dreams & Bright Days! ✨

If you're reading this in the evening 🌙, may you have the sweetest dreams filled with perfectly organized legal documents!

If you're reading this in the morning ☀️, may your day be bursting with energy, joy, and zero workplace asset mishaps!

If you're reading this during lunch 🍜, may your afternoon be as satisfying as a perfectly drafted contract!

And if you're reading this late at night 🦉, you dedicated legal eagle - may tomorrow bring you all the coffee you need and all the legal clarity you deserve!

 #VietnamLaborLaw #ResponsibilityContracts #WorkplaceLiability #EmploymentLaw #LegalTips #BusinessLaw #AssetProtection #HRManagement #VietnamBusiness #LegalAdvice


Friday, October 10, 2025

The Great Legal Debate: Two Schools of Thought 🎓⚖️

 This case has sparked a fascinating debate in Vietnamese legal circles:



⚖️ School #1: Judicial Activism ("The Justice Seekers")

Philosophy: Courts have a duty to ensure justice and apply law correctly, even if parties don't specifically request it.

Arguments FOR the Trial Court:

Supreme Court Precedent: Circular 196 explicitly allows this! ✅ Rule of Law: Courts shouldn't enforce illegal contracts just because parties agreed to them ✅ Consumer Protection: Steven was a victim; courts should protect vulnerable parties ✅ Public Interest: Fraud shouldn't be legitimized by procedure ✅ Judicial Duty: Determining contract validity is literally the court's job!

Supporters Say:

"If courts just rubber-stamp whatever parties bring them, what's the point of having judges? Might as well use vending machines!" 🤖⚖️

⚔️ School #2: Judicial Restraint ("The Procedure Protectors")

Philosophy: Courts should only resolve the specific claims brought before them, not go beyond what parties requested.

Arguments FOR the Procuracy:

Party Autonomy: Civil cases are about parties' rights; they decide what to litigate ✅ Predictability: Parties should know what they're facing in court ✅ Fairness: Novareal might have defended differently if they'd known contracts would be challenged ✅ Separation of Powers: Courts interpret law; prosecutors decide what to charge ✅ Procedural Justice: Rules exist for reasons!

Supporters Say:

"If courts can just do whatever they want regardless of what parties asked for, that's chaos! Due process matters!" 📜⚖️


🏠🚗 Real-Life Examples: When Does This Principle Apply?

Scenario 1: The Mafia Loan 🦹💰

Situation: Loan shark Vinny sues Bobby for $50,000 loan repayment. Bobby doesn't defend the case (doesn't show up). The interest rate is 500% per year (highly illegal).

Question: Can the court say "This loan is void due to illegal interest rate" even though Bobby didn't raise this defense?

Answer:

  • Trial Court Approach: YES! Courts must not enforce illegal contracts
  • Procuracy Approach: NO! If Bobby didn't defend, grant Vinny's claim

Most jurisdictions: Support the trial court approach - courts won't enforce obviously illegal contracts!

Scenario 2: The Unlicensed Contractor 🏗️❌

Situation: Unlicensed contractor sues homeowner for $100,000 payment for building work. Homeowner defends saying "work was poor quality" but doesn't mention contractor lacks required license.

Question: Can court raise the licensing issue itself?

Answer:

  • Trial Court Approach: YES! Court can notice contractor lacks legal capacity to contract
  • Procuracy Approach: NO! Only address the quality issue raised by homeowner

Varies by jurisdiction! Some courts will raise capacity issues sua sponte (on their own), others won't!

Scenario 3: The Child's Contract 👶📝

Situation: 15-year-old signs contract to buy a car for $30,000. Seller sues for payment. Minor's parents don't mention age as a defense - they just say "car is defective."

Question: Must court honor the contract since age wasn't raised?

Answer:

  • Most courts worldwide: Will notice minor status even if not raised (fundamental capacity issue)
  • This supports Trial Court approach: Some things are so fundamental courts must address them!

🤔 Did You Know? Legal Trivia Time!

Fact #1: In Vietnam's legal system, the Procuracy (Viện Kiểm sát) has a unique role - they don't just prosecute crimes, they also supervise civil trials to ensure legal compliance! This is inherited from the Soviet legal tradition! 🇻🇳⚖️

Fact #2: The "kháng nghị" (procuracy protest) is different from "kháng cáo" (party appeal):

  • 🔵 Kháng cáo = Party saying "I disagree with this verdict"
  • 🔴 Kháng nghị = Procuracy saying "This verdict violates law/procedure"
  • Both go to appellate court, but procuracy protests carry special weight! ⚖️

Fact #3: Supreme Court Circular 196 mentioned in this case is a "thông báo" (notification) of judicial interpretations - these are BINDING on lower courts! When the Supreme Court says courts can declare contracts void sua sponte, that's the law! 📜

Fact #4: This case is being decided during Vietnam Lawyer's Day (October 10)! This holiday celebrates lawyers' contributions to justice and rule of law. How fitting that a major procedural debate is happening now! 🎊⚖️👔

Fact #5: The doctrine of "ultra petita" (beyond what was sought) is a fundamental principle in civil law systems - courts generally cannot grant relief beyond what plaintiff requested. But there are exceptions - like when contracts violate "điều cấm" (prohibited acts)! 🚫

Fact #6: In common law systems (UK, US), courts have "equitable powers" to grant relief beyond specific requests if justice requires it. Vietnamese law is more restrictive - but this case tests those boundaries! 🌍⚖️

Fact #7: Online comments on this case show overwhelming public support (662+ likes) for the trial court's decision! People see it as protecting consumers from fraud. The court of public opinion has spoken! 👥💬


💡 Pro Tips: Understanding Appellate Procedure

For All Parties in Litigation ⚖️📋

Understanding Appeals:

Time Limits Matter: Most appeals must be filed within 15 days of verdict ✅ Procuracy Can Protest: Even if you win, the procuracy might challenge the verdict ✅ Three Routes to Appeal:

  • 🔵 Party appeals (kháng cáo)
  • 🔴 Procuracy protests (kháng nghị)
  • 🟡 Appellate review (giám đốc thẩm - later stage)

Don't Celebrate Too Early! 🎉⏳ Steven's story shows: A favorable first instance verdict isn't final until:

  • ✅ Appeal period expires (no appeals filed)
  • ✅ OR appellate court affirms
  • ✅ OR Supreme Court review completed

The Reality: Most first instance verdicts CAN be appealed! 📈

For Legal Professionals 👔⚖️

Strategic Considerations:

If You're a Plaintiff:

  • 📝 Be Specific: Clearly state ALL remedies you want
  • 🎯 But Not Too Specific: Courts may help you if contracts are illegal
  • ⚖️ Know the Law: Supreme Court circulars like 196 matter!

If You're a Defendant:

  • 🛡️ Raise ALL Defenses: Don't rely on court to do it for you (though they might!)
  • 📋 Counter-Sue If Appropriate: Like seeking return of payments made
  • 🔍 Research Precedents: Find cases supporting your position

If You're a Judge:

  • ⚖️ Balance: Justice vs procedure
  • 📜 Follow Supreme Court Guidance: Circular 196 is binding
  • 🧐 Document Reasoning: Explain WHY you're going beyond claims (if you do)

🎊 Special Tribute: Vietnam Lawyer's Day! 👔⚖️

October 10, 2025 marks Vietnam Lawyer's Day (Ngày Truyền thống Luật sư Việt Nam)! 🇻🇳

As this dramatic legal saga unfolds, let's take a moment to honor the legal professionals involved:

To All Vietnamese Lawyers 👨‍⚖️👩‍⚖️:

🌟 Thank you for:

  • Protecting rights and seeking justice ⚖️
  • Navigating complex laws to help clients 📚
  • Standing firm in your convictions 💪
  • Bringing professionalism to the bar 👔
  • Making law accessible to ordinary people 📢

May you always:

  • ✨ Maintain your integrity and passion
  • 💪 Keep your professional pride strong
  • 🎯 Find success in your noble profession
  • 🍀 Be blessed with good health and fortune
  • ⚖️ Continue championing justice for all!

Whether you're Team Trial Court or Team Procuracy in this debate - we celebrate your commitment to legal excellence! This case shows Vietnamese law evolving through thoughtful debate! 🎓📈

Happy Lawyer's Day! 🎉👔⚖️


🌿 Nature's "Law": The Referee Dilemma

In nature, conflicts are resolved through various mechanisms. Let's consider wolf pack disputes 🐺:

The Alpha Wolf Scenario:

  • Two wolves fight over food 🍖
  • Alpha wolf (like a judge) intervenes
  • Question: Should alpha only resolve the food dispute, or also notice one wolf is sick/injured and needs different treatment?

Most packs: Alpha assesses the WHOLE situation, not just the immediate dispute! 🐺⚖️

Another example: Bee colony decisions 🐝

  • Scout bees debate nest locations
  • Queen doesn't just pick between the two proposed sites
  • She can reject BOTH if they're inadequate and wait for better options!

The parallel: Just as natural "arbiters" sometimes go beyond the immediate dispute to ensure survival of the group, legal systems debate whether courts should ensure overall justice vs. strict procedural compliance! 🌍⚖️

In elephant herds 🐘, when two elephants have a dispute, the matriarch doesn't just separate them - she investigates the ROOT CAUSE and addresses it! Maybe one elephant is sick, maybe there's a resource shortage. Holistic justice exists in nature too!


The Arguments Visualized 📊⚖️

⚖️ THE CORE LEGAL QUESTION:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Can courts declare contracts VOID when nobody asked?

🔵 TRIAL COURT'S POSITION:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
✅ Supreme Court Circular 196 says YES
✅ Duty to apply law correctly
✅ Can't enforce illegal contracts
✅ Protect vulnerable parties
✅ Public interest in preventing fraud

🔴 PROCURACY'S POSITION:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━  
❌ Exceeded scope of lawsuit
❌ Party autonomy violated
❌ Procedural fairness compromised  
❌ Unpredictable outcomes
❌ Contracts were actually valid

🟡 THE MIDDLE GROUND?
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Maybe courts CAN declare contracts void, 
but ONLY when:
- Violation is obvious ("điều cấm")
- Public interest heavily involved
- Party couldn't reasonably raise it
- Supreme Court precedent allows it

⏰ WAITING FOR APPELLATE COURT...
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Which approach will they adopt?

📝 Quick Knowledge Quiz!

Question 1: What is a "kháng nghị" (procuracy protest)? a) When a party appeals a verdict b) When the procuracy officially challenges a court decision
c) When a lawyer objects during trial d) When the public protests outside court

Question 2: What was the Procuracy's main argument? a) Steven should pay more money b) The court exceeded the scope of the plaintiff's lawsuit c) Novareal is innocent of all charges d) Banks should never lose

Question 3: According to Supreme Court Circular 196, can courts declare mortgage contracts void even when parties don't request it? a) Never allowed b) Only if plaintiff requests c) Yes, courts must examine validity d) Only in criminal cases

Question 4: How long after the first verdict did the Procuracy file its protest? a) Same day b) 9 days c) 30 days
d) 3 months

Question 5: What does the Procuracy believe about Novareal's role? a) They committed fraud b) They were legal brokers helping Steven c) They were the actual property developer d) They were working for the bank

Question 6: In the Procuracy's view, what was the purpose of Steven's deposit? a) To ensure Novareal's performance b) To guarantee the property existed c) To prove Steven's financial capability and commitment d) To bribe officials

Question 7: Which of these parties did NOT appeal/protest the verdict? a) VPBank b) Novareal JSC c) The Procuracy d) Steven Tran

Question 8: What is October 10 in Vietnam? a) Independence Day b) Lawyer's Day c) Banking Day d) Real Estate Day

(Answers: b, b, c, b, b, c, d, b)


🎯 The Big Takeaway: Justice vs. Procedure ⚖️

This case has become a landmark debate in Vietnamese civil procedure! 🏛️

What's REALLY at Stake:

Not just whether Steven owes money (though that matters to him!) 💰

But rather: How should Vietnamese courts balance these competing values?

⚖️ Value #1: Substantive Justice

  • Protect vulnerable consumers
  • Don't enforce illegal contracts
  • Ensure fair outcomes
  • Courts as guardians of public interest

📋 Value #2: Procedural Fairness

  • Respect party autonomy
  • Predictable litigation
  • Clear procedural rules
  • Courts as neutral arbiters

The Tension:

  • 🔵 Too much activism = Unpredictable, parties don't know what courts will do
  • 🔴 Too much restraint = Illegal contracts get enforced, injustice occurs

What Makes This Case Special: 🌟

  1. 🎭 Dramatic Facts: Debt cancellation! Fraud allegations! Phantom villas!
  2. ⚖️ Clear Legal Conflict: Procuracy vs Trial Court - who's right?
  3. 📜 Supreme Court Guidance: Circular 196 in play!
  4. 💰 High Stakes: Billions of VND + precedential value
  5. 👥 Public Interest: Hundreds of similar victims watching!
  6. 🎓 Academic Debate: Law schools will teach this case for years!

The Appellate Court's Dilemma: 🤔

They must choose:

  • Affirm: Support judicial power to ensure justice (Trial Court wins)
  • Reverse: Emphasize procedural compliance (Procuracy wins)
  • 🤷 Partially Reverse: Find a middle ground?

Whatever they decide will shape Vietnamese civil procedure for years! 📈


🗣️ Your Turn to Weigh In!

This is YOUR chance to be an armchair appellate judge! 👨‍⚖️

💬 The Ultimate Question:

Should the appellate court AFFIRM or REVERSE the trial court's verdict?

Team Trial Court 🔵 (Affirm):

"Courts must ensure justice! Steven was a victim of fraud. The property didn't exist! VPBank failed due diligence! Enforcing these contracts would be unconscionable! Supreme Court Circular 196 explicitly allows this!"

Team Procuracy 🔴 (Reverse):

"Courts must follow procedure! Nobody asked for contracts to be voided! Novareal was just a broker! Steven voluntarily signed! Party autonomy matters! The court overstepped!"

Team Middle Ground 🟣 (Modify):

"Affirm the contract is void, but remand for proper procedure where all parties can be heard!"

Share your verdict in the comments! 👇

Discussion Questions:

  • 🤔 Is it fair that Steven might lose his victory on a technicality?
  • 🏦 Should banks face consequences for failing to verify property exists?
  • 🏢 Did Novareal commit fraud or were they just incompetent brokers?
  • ⚖️ Which is more important: justice or procedure?
  • 👔 How would YOU rule if you were the appellate judge?
  • 🎓 Should law schools teach "judicial activism" or "judicial restraint"?

Poll Time! 📊 If you were on the appellate court panel, you would:

  • ✅ AFFIRM (Support trial court, Steven stays debt-free)
  • ❌ REVERSE (Support procuracy, Steven owes money)
  • 🔄 REMAND (Send back for new trial with proper procedure)
  • 🤷 RECUSE (This is too complicated, I'm out!)

🚨 Fun But Serious: A Brief Legal Disclaimer 🚨

Hey there, legal explorer! 🕵️♂️ Before you go...

  • This article is like a map, not a teleporter 🗺️ It'll guide you, but won't zap your problems away!
  • Each legal journey is unique 🦄 Your mileage may vary!
  • For real-world quests, seek a professional legal wizard 🧙‍♂️ (May we suggest Thay Diep & Associates Law Firm?)

Remember: Reading this doesn't make you a lawyer, just like watching "Top Gun" doesn't make you a pilot! ✈️😉

Ultra-Important Note: This case is ACTIVELY BEING APPEALED as of October 2025! The first instance verdict is NOT final! Do NOT rely on it as settled law! ⚖️⏰

Special Note: The appellate court's decision will determine:

  • Steven's actual debt status
  • The validity of judicial activism in Vietnam
  • The scope of courts' sua sponte powers
  • Protections for real estate consumers
  • Banks' due diligence obligations

Stay tuned: This is legal history in the making! 🎬📜

For Lawyers: Both sides have legitimate arguments! This is a genuine legal controversy where reasonable minds differ! 🎓⚖️


💝 Support Your Legal Ninja's Wellness Fund! 🍵

Enjoyed Ngọc Prinny's witty legal wisdom? Help keep this ninja healthy and energized!

Every article is powered by:

  • Hours of research 📚 (This one required analyzing competing legal theories!)
  • Legal expertise spanning 10+ years ⚖️
  • Creative storytelling 📝 (Making appellate procedure exciting!)
  • Countless cups of herbal tea! 🍵 (Chamomile for this one - needed calming after all this debate!)
  • Balanced analysis 📊 (Presenting both sides fairly is HARD!)

If my posts have helped you navigate Vietnam's legal labyrinth, consider treating me to a healthy green tea! Your support helps keep:

  • The legal puns flowing 😄 ("Ultra petita" sounds like a pizza topping!)
  • The knowledge growing 🌱 (Following this case through appeals!)
  • This ninja well-rested for better content! 💪
  • The balanced analysis coming! ⚖️✨

Every cup of tea = One more appellate decision breakdown! ☕→📝

Fun fact: Writing about legal debates where BOTH sides have good points is mentally exhausting! I had to read the Procuracy's protest three times to fully understand their reasoning! Your support makes thorough analysis possible! 🤯📚

Special Thanks: To all the lawyers celebrating Vietnam Lawyer's Day - your profession makes society better! 👔🌟


Sending You Positive Legal Vibes! ✨

If you're reading this in the evening 🌙, may you sleep soundly knowing that legal appeals exist to ensure justice - even if they complicate things temporarily!

If you're reading this in the morning ☀️, may your day be filled with legal victories that DON'T get appealed! ⚖️😂

If you're reading this during lunch 🍜, may your afternoon bring only straightforward legal matters with no procedural complications!

If you're reading this late at night 🦉 (fellow legal eagle!), may your coffee be strong, your legal arguments persuasive, and may you never have your victory snatched away by appellate procedure!

If you're Steven Tran 😰📱, may you have the strength to endure this legal rollercoaster, the patience to await the appellate verdict, and may justice ultimately prevail - whatever that means in your case!

If you're a lawyer celebrating Vietnam Lawyer's Day 🎊👔, may you have wonderful celebrations, continued professional success, excellent health, and may you never stop fighting for justice (procedurally or substantively - both are valid!)!

If you're a law student 📚🎓, may this case teach you that law is never simple, that reasonable people can disagree, and that the most interesting legal questions have no clear answers!

And if you're an appellate judge assigned to this case ⚖️😅, may you have wisdom beyond measure, the courage to make hard decisions, and may legal scholars praise your reasoning for generations! (No pressure!)

May your contracts be valid, your procedures be proper, your appeals be successful, and may you always find the right balance between justice and rules! 🌟⚖️📜

P.S. Whatever the appellate court decides, this case has already achieved something amazing - it got thousands of Vietnamese people interested in civil procedure! That's a win for legal education! 🎓👥

P.P.S. Happy Vietnam Lawyer's Day to all legal professionals! Your dedication to law - whether emphasizing justice or procedure - makes society better! 🇻🇳👔⚖️🎊


 #VietnamLawUpdate #AppellateCourt #ProcuracyProtest #LawyersDay #VietnamLawyersDay #JudicialActivism #CivilProcedure #LegalDebate #VietnameseLaw #CourtAppeals #RealEstateLaw #BankingLaw #ContractLaw #LegalPrecedent #JusticeVsProcedure #VPBankCase #NovarealAppeal #SupremeCourtGuidance #LegalControversy #LawInAction

Wednesday, October 8, 2025

The Ultimate Legal Uno Reverse: From 5 Billion VND Debtor to Creditor! 🎭💰

 

Etymology Corner 📚✨

The word "void" comes from the Old French "voide," meaning "empty, vacant" - from the Latin "vocivus" (unoccupied). In legal terms, a "void contract" is as if it never existed - it's empty air, a legal vacuum! 🌪️ And in today's case, we'll see how discovering a "void" villa led to declaring a loan contract "void" - turning a desperate debtor's nightmare into a shocking victory!



In a Nutshell: The Phantom Villa Miracle 👻🏠

Imagine this nightmare scenario: You borrow 5+ BILLION VND (about $215,000 USD) to buy your dream villa 🏰. You've already paid 900 MILLION in interest 💸. Then the bank sues you because you stopped paying. You show up to court expecting to lose everything...

BUT PLOT TWIST 🎬: The judge declares:

"This villa doesn't exist. The loan is VOID. Bank, give back that 900 million. Brokerage company, YOU pay the bank!" ⚖️

September 30, 2023 - Ho Chi Minh City District 7 People's Court delivered one of the most stunning verdicts in Vietnamese real estate law, turning a debt collection lawsuit completely on its head! 🔄

The Defendant's Journey:

  • Before verdict: Debtor owing 5.32 billion VND 😰💔
  • After verdict: Creditor owed 900 million VND 🎉💰
  • Plus: No longer owes ANYTHING to the bank! ✨

This is the legal equivalent of going to traffic court for speeding and leaving with the judge ordering the police to pay YOU! 😂

📊 The Case At A Glance

🏠 THE PHANTOM VILLA SAGA
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
💰 Loan Amount: 3.65 BILLION VND
📈 Debt Ballooned To: 5.32 BILLION VND
😱 What Defendant Expected: Total financial ruin
🎯 What Actually Happened: COMPLETE LEGAL VICTORY

🎭 THE PLAYERS:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
😤 Plaintiff: VPBank
   "Pay us 5.32 billion VND NOW!"

😰 Defendant: Mr. Steven Tran (59) & Wife
   "We just want you to reduce the interest..."

🏢 Silent Defendant: Novareal JSC (Real Estate Broker)
   *didn't show up to court*

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
⚖️ THE VERDICT (Sept 30, 2025):
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
❌ Bank's Lawsuit: REJECTED
🚫 Purchase Agreement: VOID
🚫 Loan Contract: VOID
💸 Novareal → Bank: Pay 3.65 billion
💰 Bank → Steven: Return 900 million
🎊 Steven's Debt: $0.00 VND

🔍 Court's Finding: Signs of FRAUD by Novareal

The Story: A Real Estate Fairy Tale Gone Wrong 📖

Chapter 1: The Dream Villa Purchase 🏰✨

November 5, 2020: Mr. Steven Tran, age 59, signs an agreement with Novareal JSC to purchase a stunning twin villa:

  • Land area: 150 m²
  • Total floor area: 175 m²
  • Location: "Ocean Valley Resort Complex" in NovaWorld Phan Thiết
  • The pitch: Luxury resort living! 🌴☀️

Steven is excited! He pays over 2 BILLION VND as the first installment directly to Novareal. 💰

Chapter 2: The Bank Loan 🏦

November 25, 2020 (20 days later): Steven signs a credit contract with VPBank:

  • Loan amount: 3.65 BILLION VND
  • Purpose: Pay the second installment for the villa
  • Term: 36 months
  • Interest rate: 11.5% per year
  • Collateral: All property rights arising from the villa purchase agreement

The money is disbursed directly to Novareal's account at VPBank. ✅

Chapter 3: The Payment Struggle 😰💸

2020-2022: Steven pays 900 MILLION VND in interest but no principal.

December 2022: Steven stops paying entirely. Why? 🤔

Because he discovered something TERRIFYING: The villa project has serious legal problems! 🚨

By September 30, 2025:

  • Outstanding debt: 5.32 BILLION VND
    • Principal: 3.65 billion
    • Overdue interest: 1.67 billion 😱

Chapter 4: The Lawsuit ⚖️🔨

VPBank files lawsuit demanding:

  1. Pay the entire 5.32 billion 💰
  2. Continue paying overdue interest until fully repaid 📈
  3. Or we'll seize your collateral (the villa rights) 🏠

Steven and his wife show up to court resigned to their fate. They just beg:

"Please reduce the interest so we can somehow repay..." 🙏😢

Chapter 5: The Judge's Investigation 🕵️‍♀️📂

But the judges at District 7 People's Court did something BRILLIANT - they actually investigated whether this villa existed! 🔍

What they discovered shocked everyone:

🚨 Finding #1: Novareal Had No Authority

  • Novareal was just a real estate broker for the Ocean Valley project
  • By law, brokers can ONLY:
    • ✅ Connect buyers with developers
    • ✅ Receive brokerage fees/commissions
  • Brokers CANNOT:
    • ❌ Sign purchase contracts on behalf of developers
    • ❌ Collect deposit money from customers
    • ❌ Set payment terms and schedules

Yet Novareal did ALL of these illegal things! 😱

🚨 Finding #2: The Villa Doesn't Exist The court conducted an on-site inspection and sent inquiries to local authorities:

"The bank couldn't even identify the location of the land parcel where the villa was supposed to be built" 🗺️❓

Local government response: "The developer hasn't transferred management rights to us yet"

No evidence that the villa's foundation had been completed (a legal requirement for selling "future-formed property")

Translation: This was a PHANTOM PROPERTY! 👻🏚️

🚨 Finding #3: The Developer Never Authorized Novareal

  • Delta Valley Binh Thuan Co. was the actual project developer
  • Enterprise Law 2014, Article 13(5) PROHIBITS developers from authorizing anyone else to sign purchase contracts for residential properties
  • Novareal had NO legal authority to make this deal! ❌

Chapter 6: The Stunning Verdict ⚖️💥

The judges deliberated and reached a revolutionary conclusion:

On the Purchase Agreement:

"Since the property doesn't actually exist, Novareal receiving deposit money from customers is a violation of law and shows signs of the crime of 'fraud to appropriate property'" 🚔

"The agreement dated November 5, 2020 between Mr. Tran and Novareal is VOID"

On the Bank Loan: The court cited Circular 39/2016, Article 8(2) of the State Bank:

"Credit institutions must not lend to pay expenses or meet financial needs of transactions or acts prohibited by law" 📜

Since the underlying purchase agreement was void (illegal), the bank loan to finance it was ALSO void! 🚫

The court ruled:

  1. Reject VPBank's lawsuit entirely
  2. 🚫 The loan contract is VOID
  3. 💸 Novareal must repay VPBank 3.65 billion VND (the principal)
  4. 💰 VPBank must return 900 million VND to Steven (the interest he paid)
  5. 📄 Steven can file a separate lawsuit to recover the 2+ billion he paid directly to Novareal

🏠🚗 Real-Life Examples: When This Legal Principle Applies

Scenario 1: The Condo That Never Was 🏢

Situation: Emily signs a contract to buy a condo in "Sky Tower Project" through broker company BestHomes. BestHomes collects her 500 million VND deposit and helps her get a bank loan for 2 billion VND. Later, Emily discovers the developer doesn't have proper permits.

What Happens:

  • ✅ If BestHomes illegally collected deposits without developer authorization → Contract likely VOID
  • ✅ If project lacks legal foundation → Bank loan could be void too
  • ✅ Emily could demand refund from BestHomes
  • ✅ Bank must prove it conducted proper due diligence or face consequences

Scenario 2: The Legal Loan for Legal Property 🏡

Situation: John borrows from a bank to buy a completed apartment with full legal documentation from the developer directly (no broker involved). He stops paying after 2 years.

What Happens:

  • ❌ John's loan is VALID because:
    • Property actually exists ✅
    • Proper legal documentation ✅
    • Direct transaction with authorized party ✅
  • ❌ John CANNOT use Steven's defense
  • 💰 Bank CAN collect the debt
  • 🏠 Bank CAN seize the apartment

Scenario 3: The Car Loan Twist 🚗

Situation: Mike borrows money to buy a car from a dealership that turns out to be selling stolen vehicles. The car is seized by police.

Legal Analysis:

  • 🚫 The car sale contract is VOID (can't sell stolen property)
  • ⚖️ The loan contract might be void if the bank knew or should have known about the illegal nature
  • 📋 If the bank conducted proper due diligence, Mike might still owe the money
  • 💡 Key difference: Bank's knowledge and due diligence obligations

🤔 Did You Know? Legal Trivia Time!

Fact #1: In Vietnam, "future-formed property" (property being built) CAN legally be sold ONLY if the foundation is completed! This prevents developers from selling vaporware! 🏗️

Fact #2: This case cited Circular 39/2016, Article 8(2), which essentially says banks can't lend money for illegal purposes - even if the bank doesn't realize it's illegal at the time! 🏦⚖️

Fact #3: The court found "signs of fraud to appropriate property" against Novareal, which is a criminal offense in Vietnam punishable by up to 20 years in prison! 🚔⛓️

Fact #4: Novareal didn't show up to court! But the case proceeded anyway and they still got hit with the judgment. In Vietnamese civil procedure, your absence doesn't stop justice! ⚖️

Fact #5: Steven paid 900 MILLION VND in interest on a loan that the court ultimately ruled never should have existed. That's like paying rent on an apartment in an imaginary building! 👻🏢

Fact #6: This case has become a landmark precedent for Vietnamese real estate law - online comments called for it to become an "exemplary case" for future disputes! 📚⚖️

Fact #7: NovaWorld Phan Thiết is a REAL, large-scale resort project that the government is working to resolve legal issues for - but at the time of Steven's purchase, critical legal foundations weren't in place! 🏖️⚠️


😂 Legal Meme Break!

📱 Steven walks into court

Steven's brain: "Okay, maybe I can negotiate the interest down..."
           😰💭

Judge: "The villa doesn't exist. The loan is void."
           ⚖️

Steven: *surprised Pikachu face*
           😮

Steven's brain: "Wait... I'm not the debtor anymore?"
           🤯

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

VPBank's Lawsuit Evolution:

Day 1: "Steven owes us 5.32 BILLION! 😤💰"

Day 30 (Court): "Actually, YOU owe Steven 900 million! 😱"

VPBank: *Windows XP shutdown sound*
           💻📉

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Novareal Brokerage Company:

Mission: Connect buyers with developers ✅
Reality: Collected billions illegally 💰
Court: "This looks like fraud" 🚔
Novareal: *Didn't show up to court* 🏃💨

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

When you're drowning in 5 billion debt:

Normal outcome: Bankruptcy, asset seizure 📉🏠
           😭

Vietnamese court outcome: Debt cancelled, bank owes YOU money! 
           🎉💰

Steven: "Is this real life?" 🤔✨

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Real Estate Purchase Checklist:

❌ Does the property exist? "What kind of question is that?!"

This case: "Actually, VERY IMPORTANT question!" 👻🏚️

💡 Pro Tips: Protecting Yourself in Real Estate Transactions

For Property Buyers 🏠💰

DO:Verify the property's physical existence - literally go see it with your own eyes! ✅ Check developer permits - demand to see:

  • Investment license
  • Construction permits
  • Land use rights certificates
  • For "future property," confirm foundation is completed ✅ Only deal with the developer directly - avoid brokers signing purchase contracts ✅ Verify broker authorization - if using a broker, get written proof they're authorized ✅ Research the project online - check for complaints, legal issues, news coverage ✅ Consult a real estate lawyer BEFORE signing anything substantial ✅ Never let broker companies collect your money - pay directly to developer accounts

DON'T:Trust verbal promises about "the government will fix the legal issues" ❌ Sign contracts with brokers as if they're the developer ❌ Assume bank approval = legal safety - banks can make mistakes too! ❌ Rush into "limited time offers" - scammers love artificial urgency ❌ Ignore red flags like:

  • Broker collecting deposits instead of developer
  • Missing legal documents
  • Vague property descriptions
  • Pressure to sign quickly

For Banks & Lenders 🏦📋

Enhanced Due Diligence Required:

  • Physical verification - don't just rely on paperwork, inspect the property!
  • Check local government records - confirm project registration
  • Verify collateral exists - if lending against "future property," confirm foundation completion
  • Review authorization chains - ensure the party receiving funds has legal authority
  • Monitor compliance with Circular 39/2016 - don't finance illegal transactions
  • Document everything - your due diligence might save you in court!

This case shows: Banks bear responsibility for ensuring loan purposes are legal! 💼⚖️

For Real Estate Brokers 🏢📝

Stay Within Legal Bounds:

  • Know your limitations - you can ONLY:
    • Provide consultation
    • Connect buyers with developers
    • Receive brokerage fees from developers
  • NEVER:
    • Sign purchase contracts on behalf of developers
    • Collect deposit money from customers
    • Set payment terms independently
    • Pretend to have authority you don't have

Criminal exposure: This case noted "signs of fraud" - that's serious! 🚨


🌿 Nature's "Law": The Mirage Analogy

In deserts, travelers sometimes see mirages - beautiful oases that don't actually exist 🏜️💧. These optical illusions are created by light refraction through heated air layers. Animals that have evolved in deserts have learned NOT to chase mirages, because they lead nowhere and waste precious energy.

The parallel to Steven's case:

  • The Mirage = The phantom villa that never existed 🏰👻
  • The Chase = Steven's payments totaling billions of VND 💸
  • The Lesson = Nature teaches animals to verify reality before committing resources 🦎

Similarly, Vietnamese law has evolved a principle: You cannot build legal obligations on phantom foundations. Just as you can't drink from a mirage, you can't enforce a contract for property that doesn't exist! 🚰❌

In nature, female bower birds 🐦 inspect the "bowers" (elaborate nests) that males build before mating. If the nest is poorly constructed or in a bad location, she rejects the male - even if he spent weeks building it!

The legal parallel: Courts will inspect the "foundation" of contracts. If the underlying property is a phantom (like a poorly-built bower), the entire contract structure collapses - regardless of how much effort went into signing documents! 📄❌


📝 Quick Knowledge Quiz!

Question 1: Why was Steven's villa purchase agreement declared void? a) He didn't pay enough money b) The villa/property didn't actually exist c) He was too old to buy property d) The interest rate was too high

Question 2: What was Novareal's legal role in the transaction? a) Developer b) Bank c) Real estate broker d) Government inspector

Question 3: According to the court, what was Novareal legally allowed to do? a) Sign purchase contracts and collect deposits b) Only connect buyers with developers for commission c) Guarantee property quality d) Make any agreements they want

Question 4: Why was the bank loan declared void? a) Steven didn't have good credit b) The interest rate was too high c) Banks cannot lend for illegal/prohibited transactions d) Steven asked really nicely

Question 5: After the verdict, how much did Steven owe the bank? a) 5.32 billion VND b) 3.65 billion VND c) 900 million VND d) ZERO - the bank owed HIM 900 million!

Question 6: What legal provision prohibited the bank from making this loan? a) Enterprise Law 2020 b) Circular 39/2016, Article 8(2) c) Civil Code 2015 d) There was no such provision

Question 7: What did the court say Novareal's actions showed signs of? a) Negligence b) Breach of contract c) Fraud to appropriate property (criminal) d) Poor business practices

Question 8: Can Steven still recover the 2+ billion he paid directly to Novareal? a) No, it's gone forever b) Yes, but he must file a separate lawsuit c) The court already ordered it returned d) Only if the bank agrees

(Answers: b, c, b, c, d, b, c, b)


🎯 The Big Takeaway

This case establishes a critical principle in Vietnamese law:

"When the foundation is phantom, the entire structure crumbles. You cannot enforce contracts built on property that doesn't exist, and banks cannot lend money to finance illegal transactions - even if nobody realized it was illegal at the time." 🏗️💥

The Three-Tier Collapse:

  1. 🏚️ No Real Property → Purchase Agreement is VOID
  2. ❌ Void Purchase → Loan Contract is VOID (can't finance illegal deals)
  3. 💰 Void Loan → Money must be returned to original positions

Key Lessons:

For Borrowers 😰→😊:

  • ✅ Even if you signed contracts, if the underlying transaction is illegal, you might escape the debt!
  • ⚠️ But you still need to recover money you paid directly (separate lawsuit)
  • 💡 Always verify property existence BEFORE borrowing!

For Banks 🏦📉:

  • ⚠️ Due diligence is MANDATORY - you can't just trust the borrower's documents
  • 📋 Verify the collateral actually exists - site inspections required!
  • ⚖️ Circular 39/2016 is serious - lending for illegal purposes = void contract
  • 💸 You might have to return ALL interest received!

For Real Estate Brokers 🏢🚨:

  • 🚫 Stay in your lane - connect buyers and developers, nothing more
  • Never collect customer deposits - that's the developer's role
  • ⚠️ Overstepping = Criminal Exposure - the court found "signs of fraud"
  • 📜 Get proper written authorization for EVERYTHING you do

The Emotional Journey 🎢: Steven went from:

  • 😊 Excited villa buyer (Nov 2020)
  • 😰 Struggling debtor (2020-2022)
  • 😱 Stopped paying, facing lawsuit (2022-2023)
  • 😔 Preparing to lose everything (Sept 2023)
  • 🤯 Shocked by verdict (Sept 30, 2023)
  • 😊🎉 Debt-free creditor (aftermath!)

Public Reaction 💬: Over 100 comments on news articles praised the verdict:

  • "Thank you to the court for fair judgment!" (662 likes) 👍
  • "This should be an exemplary case!" (549 likes) 📚
  • "Even the defendant didn't know they'd been scammed until the trial!" (444 likes) 😱

🗣️ Your Turn to Weigh In!

We want YOUR thoughts!

💬 Discussion Questions:

  • Should banks face penalties beyond returning the interest? They clearly failed due diligence! 🏦❌
  • Is it fair that Steven still needs to file a separate lawsuit to recover the 2+ billion he paid directly? ⚖️💰
  • Should Novareal face criminal charges? The court found "signs of fraud"! 🚔
  • Do Vietnamese real estate laws provide enough protection for buyers? 🏠🛡️
  • Have you or someone you know been scammed by "future-formed property" deals? 😰
  • Should brokers be required to have insurance to cover situations like this? 💼

Share your experiences in the comments below! 👇

Did this case give you hope or make you more worried about real estate investments? Let's debate! 🔥

Poll Time! 📊 After reading this case, how do you feel about buying "future-formed property" in Vietnam?

  • 😰 Too risky, I'll only buy completed property
  • 🤔 Risky but okay if I verify everything carefully
  • 😊 Fine if buying directly from licensed developers
  • 🏃 Running away from real estate entirely!

🚨 Fun But Serious: A Brief Legal Disclaimer 🚨

Hey there, legal explorer! 🕵️♂️ Before you go...

  • This article is like a map, not a teleporter 🗺️ It'll guide you, but won't zap your problems away!
  • Each legal journey is unique 🦄 Your mileage may vary!
  • For real-world quests, seek a professional legal wizard 🧙‍♂️ (May we suggest Thay Diep & Associates Law Firm?)

Remember: Reading this doesn't make you a lawyer, just like watching "Top Gun" doesn't make you a pilot! ✈️😉

Important Note: This case (HCMC District 7 People's Court, September 30, 2023) is currently subject to potential appeal by Novareal. The company has announced plans to appeal, claiming procedural violations. However, the legal principles established remain important precedent regardless! ⚖️

Critical Reminder: If you're in a similar situation:

  1. Don't wait - seek legal counsel immediately 📞
  2. Gather all documents - contracts, payment receipts, communications 📄
  3. Check the property - does it physically exist? 🏠
  4. Verify authorizations - who has legal power to sign what? ✍️
  5. Know your venue - this case notes arbitration clauses may apply 📋

Not Legal Advice: This article analyzes a specific court decision for educational purposes. Your situation may differ significantly! 🎓


💝 Support Your Legal Ninja's Wellness Fund! 🍵

Enjoyed Ngọc Prinny's witty legal wisdom? Help keep this ninja healthy and energized!

Every article is powered by:

  • Hours of research 📚 (This analysis required reading multiple Vietnamese news sources and legal documents!)
  • Legal expertise spanning 10+ years ⚖️
  • Creative storytelling 📝 (Turning dense legal verdicts into engaging narratives!)
  • Countless cups of herbal tea! 🍵 (Lotus tea for this one - helps process shocking plot twists!)
  • Emotional investment 💝 (Honestly teared up reading about Steven's relief!)

If my posts have helped you navigate Vietnam's legal labyrinth, consider treating me to a healthy green tea! Your support helps keep:

  • The legal puns flowing 😄 (Void where prohibited!)
  • The knowledge growing 🌱 (More landmark cases analyzed!)
  • This ninja well-rested for better content! 💪
  • The shocking legal victories coming! ⚖️✨

Every cup of tea = One more underdog legal victory story! ☕→📝

Fun fact: Analyzing this case required understanding the intersection of banking law, real estate law, broker regulations, criminal law hints, and civil procedure - it's like a legal crossword puzzle! Your support makes these deep dives possible! 🤿⚖️


Sending You Positive Legal Vibes! ✨

If you're reading this in the evening 🌙, may you sleep soundly knowing that sometimes justice truly prevails against all odds! Sweet dreams of debt-free tomorrows!

If you're reading this in the morning ☀️, may your day be filled with pleasant surprises as wonderful as discovering your 5 billion debt has been cancelled!

If you're reading this during lunch 🍜, may your afternoon bring only real estate deals for properties that actually exist!

If you're reading this late at night 🦉 (fellow legal eagle!), may your coffee be strong, your property verifications thorough, and may you NEVER finance a phantom villa!

If you're reading this while stressed about a real estate deal 😰📱, may you have the wisdom to verify everything, the courage to walk away from suspicious deals, and the luck to find honest brokers!

If you're reading this after being scammed by a "future property" scheme 💔, may this case give you hope that Vietnamese courts DO protect victims, and may you find the strength to fight for your money back!

And if you're a banker reading this 🏦😅, may your due diligence be thorough, your site inspections detailed, and may you NEVER have to return 900 million VND in interest!

May your property purchases be for real buildings, your contracts be enforceable, and may you never discover that your dream home is actually a mirage! 🏠✨🙏

P.S. If you're currently in a similar situation, don't lose hope! Steven prepared to lose everything but walked away debt-free. Justice can happen! ⚖️💪

P.P.S. And remember: In Vietnamese court, "vô hiệu" (void) can be your best friend! 😂

#VietnamRealEstateLaw #VoidContract #PhantomProperty #LegalVictory #RealEstateFraud #BankingLaw #ConsumerProtection #VietnameseLaw #CourtDecision #DebtCancelled #PropertyScam #LegalMiracle #NovaWorld #RealEstateBroker #FutureProperty #HCMCCourt #JusticeServed #LegalPrecedent #ContractLaw #FinancialFreedom


Featured Post

🌟 The SMART S KISS Revolution: Your 90-Day Journey to a Healthier You! 💪

Etymology Corner 📚 The word " diet " comes from the Greek " diaita " meaning "way of life" - not deprivatio...